Thursday, March 12, 2009

Credible VS Non-Credible

CREDIBLE



My first credible source is http://www.mountzionpbc.org/Index/index11.htm
the three reason i know this site is credible is because first it is from .org. secondly it clearly states the authors name. lastly it doesn't have any extra advertisements.





















My second credible source is http://www.bmhcc.org/facilities/womens/ the reason it can be a credible source is because it has an author, its .org , and lastly it don't have any extra advertisement.


NON-CREDIBLE

My first non-credible source is http://www.baptisttop1000.com/ because first it has the .com , secondly it is filled with advertisements, lastly it doesn't state an author

My second non-credible is http://www.landoverbaptist.org/ because even tho it has .org it has allot of advertisements, there is no author name on the site, or do it has a focus .

2 comments:

  1. Good work on this post. You take us step by step through your explanation of credible versus non-credible. You're writing is stronger here.

    ReplyDelete